Llama Guard 4 12B vs Pareto
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 20.8× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Pareto has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Pareto | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.18 | $2.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.18 | $7.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $3.75 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.25 |
| Context window | 164K | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 3 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2026-09-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Pareto?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 20.8× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Pareto: which has a bigger context window?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Pareto: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Pareto ≈ $8,750.
More comparisons
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama Guard 4 12B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Hy4Llama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs Kimi K3.1 ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama Guard 4 12B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLlama Guard 4 12B vs Gemini 4 ArgonLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Llama Guard 4 12B vs Nano Banana 2.1Llama Guard 4 12B vs Mistral Large 4Pareto vs Gemini 4 CarbonPareto vs Claude Fable 5.2Pareto vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashPareto vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashPareto vs Hy4Pareto vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalPareto vs GPT-6.1 TerraPareto vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro