Llama Guard 4 12B vs Pareto

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
U
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 20.8× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Pareto has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
Llama Guard 4 12BPareto
Input price / 1M$0.18$2.50
Output price / 1M$0.18$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$3.75
Cached input / 1M—$0.25
Context window164K262K
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302026-09-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Pareto?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 20.8× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Pareto: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Pareto: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Pareto ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons

Llama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLlama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Grok 4.7Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 AstraLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Astra ProPareto vs GLM 5.3 PrimePareto vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePareto vs Command A+Pareto vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto vs GPT-6 LunaPareto vs GPT-6 Sol ProPareto vs GPT-6 SolPareto vs Claude Opus 5.5