Llama Guard 4 12B vs Muse Ember

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta

Muse Ember

Meta
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
Meta
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 10% cheaper than Muse Ember on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Muse Ember has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
Llama Guard 4 12BMuse Ember
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.20
Cached input / 1M—$0.004
Context window164K1M
Max output16K944K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers3—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302026-11-09
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Muse Ember?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 10% cheaper than Muse Ember on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Muse Ember: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Muse Ember: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Muse Ember ≈ $450.00.

More comparisons