Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Qwen3 8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 9.0× cheaper than Qwen3 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Tiny has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.015 | $0.12 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.045 | $0.46 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0225 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.003 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 250K | 8K |
| Intelligence index | — | 7.3 |
| Coding index | 26.5 | 9 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-06 | 2025-04-28 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-10-09 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Tiny or Qwen3 8B?
Ling 3.0 Tiny is 9.0× cheaper than Qwen3 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Qwen3 8B: which has a bigger context window?
Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 8B: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50, Qwen3 8B ≈ $461.50.
More comparisons
Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini 4 CarbonLing 3.0 Tiny vs Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Hy4Ling 3.0 Tiny vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLing 3.0 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.0 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.0 Tiny vs Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.0 Tiny vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLing 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.0 Tiny vs Claude Haiku 5.5Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Nano Banana 2.1Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Mistral Large 4Qwen3 8B vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 8B vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 8B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 8B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 8B vs Hy4Qwen3 8B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 8B vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3 8B vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro