Ling 3.0 Flash vs Solar Pro 3
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 8.3× cheaper than Solar Pro 3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
| Ling 3.0 Flash | Solar Pro 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.021 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.063 | $0.60 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0315 | $0.26 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0042 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 118K |
| Intelligence index | — | 7.8 |
| Coding index | 50.6 | 16.2 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-23 | 2026-01-27 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Solar Pro 3?
Ling 3.0 Flash is 8.3× cheaper than Solar Pro 3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Solar Pro 3: which has a bigger context window?
Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Solar Pro 3: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Solar Pro 3 ≈ $600.00.
More comparisons
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLing 3.0 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs Grok 4.7Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLing 3.0 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProSolar Pro 3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSolar Pro 3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSolar Pro 3 vs Command A+Solar Pro 3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProSolar Pro 3 vs GPT-6 LunaSolar Pro 3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProSolar Pro 3 vs GPT-6 SolSolar Pro 3 vs Claude Opus 5.5