Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 6.4× cheaper than Qwen3 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
| Ling 3.0 Flash | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.021 | $0.12 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.063 | $0.46 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0315 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0042 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 8K |
| Intelligence index | — | 7.3 |
| Coding index | 50.6 | 9 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-23 | 2025-04-28 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-10-09 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3 8B?
Ling 3.0 Flash is 6.4× cheaper than Qwen3 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 8B: which has a bigger context window?
Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 8B: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Qwen3 8B ≈ $461.50.
More comparisons
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonLing 3.0 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs Hy4Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.0 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.0 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.0 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLing 3.0 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.0 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1Ling 3.0 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Qwen3 8B vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 8B vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 8B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 8B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 8B vs Hy4Qwen3 8B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 8B vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3 8B vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro