LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: LFM2.5-2.6B is 15.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
| LFM2.5-2.6B | Qwen3.8 Max Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.35 | $4.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | $12.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.39 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.04 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 7.7 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-11 | 2026-09-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, LFM2.5-2.6B or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
LFM2.5-2.6B is 15.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?
LFM2.5-2.6B: 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: LFM2.5-2.6B ≈ $950.00, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.
More comparisons
LFM2.5-2.6B vs GPT-6.1 TerraLFM2.5-2.6B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLFM2.5-2.6B vs Kimi K3.1 ProLFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLFM2.5-2.6B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLFM2.5-2.6B vs Gemini 4 ArgonLFM2.5-2.6B vs Claude Haiku 5.5LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nano Banana 2.1LFM2.5-2.6B vs Mistral Large 4LFM2.5-2.6B vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProLFM2.5-2.6B vs GPT-6.1 SolLFM2.5-2.6B vs Claude Sonnet 5.5LFM2.5-2.6B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLFM2.5-2.6B vs Command A+LFM2.5-2.6B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3.8 Max Prime vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Claude Haiku 5.5