Llama 3 8B Lunaris vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

S

Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Sao10k
$0.04 / $0.05
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
S
M
Verdict: Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 3.5× cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 8K).
Llama 3 8B LunarisLlama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M$0.04$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.05$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.0425$0.15
Cached input / 1M
Context window8K1.3M
Max output7K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index8.2
Providers3
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
Released2024-08-132025-04-05
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3 8B Lunaris or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 3.5× cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3 8B Lunaris vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3 8B Lunaris: 8,192 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3 8B Lunaris ≈ $105.00, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons