Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Sao10k
$0.04 / $0.05
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
S
Verdict: Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 70.6× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nano Banana 2.1 has the larger context window (66K vs 8K).
Nano Banana 2.1Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.04
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.05
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.0425
Cached input / 1M——
Context window66K8K
Max output59K7K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-062024-08-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Llama 3 8B Lunaris?

Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 70.6× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris: 8,192 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Llama 3 8B Lunaris ≈ $105.00.

More comparisons