DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Sao10k
$0.04 / $0.05
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
S
Verdict: Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 3.5× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.04
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.05
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.0425
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M8K
Max output393K7K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-172024-08-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Llama 3 8B Lunaris?

Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 3.5× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris: 8,192 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Llama 3 8B Lunaris ≈ $105.00.

More comparisons