Kimi K2.6 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI
$0.95 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 8.6× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K2.6 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Kimi K2.6Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.95$0.20
Output price / 1M$4.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$1.71$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.16
Context window262K131K
Max output236K118K
Intelligence index27
Coding index61.8
Providers221
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-04-202026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 8.6× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Kimi K2.6 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons