Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Seed-2.0-Code
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 14.6× cheaper than Seed-2.0-Code on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Seed-2.0-Code has the larger context window (262K vs 8K).
| Hy-MT2-1.8B | Seed-2.0-Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.044 | $0.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.18 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0772 | $1.13 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 8K | 262K |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-20 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-11-11 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy-MT2-1.8B or Seed-2.0-Code?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 14.6× cheaper than Seed-2.0-Code on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Seed-2.0-Code: which has a bigger context window?
Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens. Seed-2.0-Code: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50, Seed-2.0-Code ≈ $2,500.
More comparisons
Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5Hy-MT2-1.8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedHy-MT2-1.8B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashHy-MT2-1.8B vs Grok 4.7Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashHy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXHy-MT2-1.8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 AstraHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Astra ProSeed-2.0-Code vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSeed-2.0-Code vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSeed-2.0-Code vs Command A+Seed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 Luna ProSeed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 LunaSeed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 Sol ProSeed-2.0-Code vs GPT-6 SolSeed-2.0-Code vs Claude Opus 5.5