Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Kimi K2.6

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

T

Hy-MT2-1.8B

Tencent
$0.044 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI
$0.95 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
T
M
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 22.2× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K2.6 has the larger context window (262K vs 8K).
Hy-MT2-1.8BKimi K2.6
Input price / 1M$0.044$0.95
Output price / 1M$0.18$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.0772$1.71
Cached input / 1M—$0.16
Context window8K262K
Max output4K236K
Intelligence index—27
Coding index—61.8
Providers122
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-08-202026-04-20
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Hy-MT2-1.8B or Kimi K2.6?

Hy-MT2-1.8B is 22.2× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Kimi K2.6: which has a bigger context window?

Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens. Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50, Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900.

More comparisons

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5Hy-MT2-1.8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedHy-MT2-1.8B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashHy-MT2-1.8B vs Grok 4.7Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashHy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXHy-MT2-1.8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 AstraHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Astra ProKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5