Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite
$0.06 / $0.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.23 / $2.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
Q
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 7.0× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12.7 vs 11.1).
Granite 4.2 8BQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.23
Output price / 1M$0.25$2.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.015
Context window131K131K
Max output118K118K
Intelligence index11.112.7
Coding index22.422.1
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-312025-07-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Granite 4.2 8B is 7.0× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $245.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,610.

More comparisons