GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Prime

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$2.80 / $8.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.23 / $2.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 5.8× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$2.80$0.23
Output price / 1M$8.80$2.30
Blended price (3:1)$4.30$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.56
Context window1M131K
Max output131K118K
Intelligence index12.7
Coding index22.1
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-232025-07-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Prime or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 5.8× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Prime vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Prime: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Prime ≈ $10,000, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,610.

More comparisons