Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite
$0.06 / $0.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA
$0.05 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 19% cheaper than Granite 4.2 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (11.1 vs 8.9). Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Granite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.05
Output price / 1M$0.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.0875
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.03
Context window131K262K
Max output118K236K
Intelligence index11.18.9
Coding index22.414.4
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-312025-12-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 19% cheaper than Granite 4.2 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $245.00, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ≈ $200.00.

More comparisons