Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat 2.0
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Granite 4.2 8B is 4.9× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. LongCat 2.0 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (19.1 vs 11.1). LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Granite 4.2 8B | LongCat 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.06 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.25 | $1.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.11 | $0.52 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.015 | $0.006 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 118K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 11.1 | 19.1 |
| Coding index | 22.4 | 45.3 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-31 | 2026-07-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or LongCat 2.0?
Granite 4.2 8B is 4.9× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat 2.0: which has a bigger context window?
Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. LongCat 2.0: 1,048,756 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $245.00, LongCat 2.0 ≈ $1,200.
More comparisons
Granite 4.2 8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGranite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGranite 4.2 8B vs Command A+Granite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 LunaGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 SolGranite 4.2 8B vs Claude Opus 5.5Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGranite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGranite 4.2 8B vs Grok 4.7Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGranite 4.2 8B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGranite 4.2 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 AstraGranite 4.2 8B vs GPT-6 Astra ProLongCat 2.0 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLongCat 2.0 vs Command A+LongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 LunaLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLongCat 2.0 vs GPT-6 SolLongCat 2.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5