Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Granite 4.2 8B

IBM Granite
$0.06 / $0.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 16% cheaper than Granite 4.2 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.6 vs 11.1). Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Granite 4.2 8BLing 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.06
Output price / 1M$0.25$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.012
Context window131K262K
Max output118K236K
Intelligence index11.122.6
Coding index22.455.6
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-312026-08-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 16% cheaper than Granite 4.2 8B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B: 131,072 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.2 8B ≈ $245.00, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons