GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Llama Guard 4 12B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

OpenAI

GPT Image 2.6 Flare

OpenAI
$5.00 / —
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
OpenAI
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B has the larger context window (164K vs —).
GPT Image 2.6 FlareLlama Guard 4 12B
Input price / 1M$5.00$0.18
Output price / 1M—$0.18
Blended price (3:1)—$0.18
Cached input / 1M$1.25—
Context window—164K
Max output—16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers—3
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoNo
Released2026-11-042025-04-30
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT Image 2.6 Flare or Llama Guard 4 12B?

GPT Image 2.6 Flare and Llama Guard 4 12B are priced identically.

GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?

GPT Image 2.6 Flare: — tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT Image 2.6 Flare ≈ $10,000, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.

More comparisons