GLM 5.3 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.84 / $2.64
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Ministral 3 8B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.15 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
M
Verdict: Ministral 3 8B 2512 is 8.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (44.8 vs 5.5). GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3Ministral 3 8B 2512
Input price / 1M$0.84$0.15
Output price / 1M$2.64$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$1.29$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.16$0.015
Context window1.3M262K
Max output131K210K
Intelligence index44.85.5
Coding index74.89.7
Providers343
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%98.8%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-182025-12-02
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Ministral 3 8B 2512?

Ministral 3 8B 2512 is 8.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens. Ministral 3 8B 2512: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000, Ministral 3 8B 2512 ≈ $375.00.

More comparisons