GLM 5.3 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 7.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 164K).
| GLM 5.3 | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.84 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.64 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.29 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | — |
| Context window | 1.3M | 164K |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 44.8 | — |
| Coding index | 74.8 | — |
| Providers | 34 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-08-18 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 7.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Command A+GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5