GLM 5.3 vs Grok Build 0.1
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Grok Build 0.1 is 3% cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 256K).
| GLM 5.3 | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.84 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.64 | $2.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.29 | $1.25 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | $0.20 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 256K |
| Max output | 131K | 230K |
| Intelligence index | 44.8 | — |
| Coding index | 74.8 | 51.5 |
| Providers | 34 | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-18 | 2026-05-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is 3% cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 vs Grok Build 0.1: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens. Grok Build 0.1: 256,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000, Grok Build 0.1 ≈ $3,000.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Command A+GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGrok Build 0.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok Build 0.1 vs Command A+Grok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok Build 0.1 vs GPT-6 SolGrok Build 0.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5