GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6.1 Terra
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 is 5.0× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (51.3 vs 31.7). GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| GLM 5.3 | GPT-6.1 Terra | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0699 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.40 | $5.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.40 | $2.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0689 | $0.05 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
| Max output | 944K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | 31.7 | 51.3 |
| Coding index | 74.8 | — |
| Providers | 48 | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-18 | 2026-10-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or GPT-6.1 Terra?
GLM 5.3 is 5.0× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6.1 Terra: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3: 1,048,576 tokens. GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 ≈ $839.80, GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 vs Hy4GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro