Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.3

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0699 / $1.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 2.0× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (36.5 vs 31.7). GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.0699
Output price / 1M$0.50$1.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.40
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.0689
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index36.531.7
Coding index—74.8
Providers1048
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-08-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or GLM 5.3?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 2.0× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.3: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, GLM 5.3 ≈ $839.80.

More comparisons