DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.098 / $0.29

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

GLM 5.3

Z.ai (Zhipu)

$0.0699 / $1.40

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.7× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (31.7 vs 28.6).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	GLM 5.3
Input price / 1M	$0.098	$0.0699
Output price / 1M	$0.29	$1.40
Blended price (3:1)	$0.15	$0.40
Cached input / 1M	$0.0029	$0.0689
Context window	1M	1M
Max output	393K	944K
Intelligence index	28.6	31.7
Coding index	—	74.8
Providers	47	48
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-08-18
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 5.3?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.7× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.3: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, GLM 5.3 ≈ $839.80.

More comparisons