GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 3.9× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.37 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.59 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.09 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 1.3M |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | 1 | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 99.9% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-18 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 3.9× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5