DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.0× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 FlashX
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.37
Output price / 1M$0.29$1.25
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.59
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.075
Context window1M1M
Max output393K131K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers471
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-09-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 5.3 FlashX?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.0× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.

More comparisons