GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.15
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.075$0.02
Context window1M1M
Max output131K944K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index——
Providers110
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons