GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.32 / $1.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.4× cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 25.2). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.32
Output price / 1M$0.50$1.28
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$0.56
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.064
Context window1.3M1M
Max output944K131K
Intelligence index41.825.2
Coding index71.555.9
Providers31—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-06-03
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.4× cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.7 Plus: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Qwen3.7 Plus ≈ $1,280.

More comparisons

GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.7 Plus vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.7 Plus vs Command A+Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.7 Plus vs Claude Opus 5.5