GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
M
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.2× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 22.8). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 205K).
GLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M2.7
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.50$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$0.52
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.06
Context window1.3M205K
Max output944K131K
Intelligence index41.822.8
Coding index71.552.6
Providers319
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-03-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or MiniMax M2.7?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.2× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. MiniMax M2.7: 204,800 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, MiniMax M2.7 ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons

GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiniMax M2.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiniMax M2.7 vs Command A+MiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-6 LunaMiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-6 SolMiniMax M2.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5