Gemma 4 31B vs Inkling
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Gemma 4 31B is 7.0× cheaper than Inkling on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Inkling scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12.5 vs 4.4). Inkling has the larger context window (524K vs 262K).
| Gemma 4 31B | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.20 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.40 | $4.05 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.25 | $1.76 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.17 |
| Context window | 262K | 524K |
| Max output | 16K | 472K |
| Intelligence index | 4.4 | 12.5 |
| Coding index | 43.4 | 52.1 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-07-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Inkling?
Gemma 4 31B is 7.0× cheaper than Inkling on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 4 31B vs Inkling: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 4 31B ≈ $600.00, Inkling ≈ $4,025.
More comparisons
Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini 4 CarbonGemma 4 31B vs Claude Fable 5.2Gemma 4 31B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGemma 4 31B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGemma 4 31B vs Hy4Gemma 4 31B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGemma 4 31B vs GPT-6.1 TerraGemma 4 31B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGemma 4 31B vs Kimi K3.1 ProGemma 4 31B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGemma 4 31B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemma 4 31B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGemma 4 31B vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemma 4 31B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Gemma 4 31B vs Nano Banana 2.1Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Large 4Inkling vs Gemini 4 CarbonInkling vs Claude Fable 5.2Inkling vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashInkling vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashInkling vs Hy4Inkling vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalInkling vs GPT-6.1 TerraInkling vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro