Nano Banana 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 15.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.20
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.20
Cached input / 1M——
Context window66K131K
Max output59K118K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-062026-06-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 15.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons