Nano Banana 2.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Meta
$0.10 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Meta
Verdict: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 24.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.10
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.13
Cached input / 1M—$0.002
Context window66K1M
Max output59K944K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-062026-09-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 24.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ≈ $300.00.

More comparisons