Claude Fable 5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Meta
$0.10 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Meta
Verdict: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 128.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.10
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.13
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.002
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-09-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 128.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ≈ $300.00.

More comparisons