Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta Llama
$0.35 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 4 Maverick is 5.9× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (524K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Llama 4 Maverick
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.35
Output price / 1M$7.50$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.51
Cached input / 1M—$0.17
Context window66K524K
Max output59K33K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—16.3
Providers12
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-062025-04-05
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is 5.9× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick: 524,288 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Llama 4 Maverick ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons