Claude Fable 5.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta Llama
$0.35 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 4 Maverick is 31.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 524K).
Claude Fable 5.2Llama 4 Maverick
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.35
Output price / 1M$40.00$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.51
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.17
Context window1M524K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index—16.3
Providers52
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072025-04-05
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is 31.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Llama 4 Maverick: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick: 524,288 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Llama 4 Maverick ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons