Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Sao10k
$0.65 / $0.75
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
S
Verdict: Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B is 4.4× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B has the larger context window (131K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.65
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.75
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.68
Cached input / 1M——
Context window66K131K
Max output59K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-062024-12-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B?

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B is 4.4× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B ≈ $1,675.

More comparisons