Claude Fable 5.2 vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Sao10k
$0.65 / $0.75
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
S
Verdict: Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B is 23.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Fable 5.2Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.65
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.75
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.68
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M131K
Max output128K16K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072024-12-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B?

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B is 23.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B ≈ $1,675.

More comparisons