Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Google

$0.30 / $2.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI

$0.06 / $0.18

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 9.4× cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 22.2). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M	$0.30	$0.06
Output price / 1M	$2.50	$0.18
Blended price (3:1)	$0.85	$0.09
Cached input / 1M	$0.03	$0.012
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	66K	33K
Intelligence index	22.2	24.6
Coding index	49.3	57
Providers	8	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-07-21	2026-09-10
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 9.4× cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ≈ $1,850, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons