Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
M
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 7.5× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 131K).
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Llama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M$0.50$0.10
Output price / 1M$3.00$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$1.13$0.15
Cached input / 1M
Context window131K1.3M
Max output33K16K
Intelligence index
Coding index8.2
Providers23
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-182025-04-05
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 7.5× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ≈ $2,500, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons