DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Google
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 7.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.50
Output price / 1M$0.29$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$1.13
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M131K
Max output393K33K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers472
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-172026-06-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 7.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ≈ $2,500.

More comparisons