Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 4.9× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.50$0.15
Output price / 1M$3.00$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$1.13$0.23
Cached input / 1M—$0.02
Context window131K1M
Max output33K944K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index——
Providers210
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-182026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 4.9× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ≈ $2,500, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons