Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google
$1.25 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 38.2× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 16.1). Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Gemini 2.5 ProLing 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$1.25$0.06
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$3.44$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.13$0.012
Context window1M262K
Max output66K33K
Intelligence index16.124.6
Coding index33.357
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-06-172026-09-10
Retirement2026-10-20

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 38.2× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 2.5 Pro ≈ $7,500, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons