Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Grok 4.7 is 30% cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.4 vs 16.1). Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 500K).
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.25 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.44 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.13 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Max output | 66K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | 16.1 | 46.4 |
| Coding index | 33.3 | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | 2026-10-20 | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is 30% cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 2.5 Pro ≈ $7,500, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemini 2.5 Pro vs Command A+Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 LunaGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 SolGemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemini 2.5 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5