Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 4.3× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Gemini 2.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.20
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.03
Context window1M131K
Max output66K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2025-06-172026-06-04
Retirement2026-10-20

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 4.3× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 2.5 Flash ≈ $1,850, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons