Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Grok 4.7

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

Grok 4.7

xAI
$1.60 / $4.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
X
Verdict: Gemini 2.5 Flash is 2.8× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 500K).
Gemini 2.5 FlashGrok 4.7
Input price / 1M$0.30$1.60
Output price / 1M$2.50$4.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$2.40
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.40
Context window1M500K
Max output66K450K
Intelligence index—46.4
Coding index——
Providers—4
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-06-172026-09-21
Retirement2026-10-20—

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Grok 4.7?

Gemini 2.5 Flash is 2.8× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 2.5 Flash ≈ $1,850, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.

More comparisons

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemini 2.5 Flash vs Command A+Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGemini 2.5 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemini 2.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemini 2.5 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemini 2.5 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProGemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5