Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 3.7× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.15
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.016
Context window33K1M
Max output8K131K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-10-072026-09-21
Retirement2027-03-15

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 3.7× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ≈ $1,850, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons