Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google

$0.30 / $2.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)

$2.00 / $6.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 3.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).

	Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)	Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M	$0.30	$2.00
Output price / 1M	$2.50	$6.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.85	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	$0.03	$0.25
Context window	33K	1M
Max output	8K	131K
Intelligence index	—	45.4
Coding index	—	76.2
Providers	—	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	No	Yes
Tool calling	No	Yes
Released	2025-10-07	2026-09-03
Retirement	2027-03-15	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 3.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ≈ $1,850, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons