Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Qwen (Alibaba)
$4.00 / $12.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
Q
Verdict: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 7.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Input price / 1M$0.30$4.00
Output price / 1M$2.50$12.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$6.00
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.50
Context window33K1M
Max output8K131K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-10-072026-09-23
Retirement2027-03-15

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 7.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ≈ $1,850, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.

More comparisons