DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.14 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.26 / $2.08
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 3.4× cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.5 vs 15.6). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.26
Output price / 1M$0.42$2.08
Blended price (3:1)$0.21$0.72
Cached input / 1M$0.0042
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Intelligence index39.515.6
Coding index45.7
Providers26
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-02-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 3.4× cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ≈ $1,560.

More comparisons