DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek

$0.14 / $0.42

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Sao10k

$0.65 / $0.75

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 3.2× cheaper than Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.65
Output price / 1M	$0.42	$0.75
Blended price (3:1)	$0.21	$0.68
Cached input / 1M	$0.0042	—
Context window	1M	131K
Max output	131K	16K
Intelligence index	39.5	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	26	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	No
Released	2026-09-10	2024-12-18
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 3.2× cheaper than Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B ≈ $1,675.

More comparisons